Action Items

ACTION: Sheldon and Michael will coordinate with John offline to come with a plan to extrapolate all the players to have a substantive discussing for the 1KPmeeting.
ACTION: The week of November 14 – 20 Sheldon will start working on a written document and finding materials for the meeting. He will post an address on the wiki and asks for contributions to the document.
posted here: TR_Mock-up
ACTION: Michael will follow up with Todd and Cecile to get the Computational Biologist job position resolved.

Agenda

• review action items from previous meeting
• review progress for WG, project goals and timelines
• open discussion

Notes

Action Item Review

• Item 1 – Sheldon and Michael did not get a chance to follow up with John will do so this week
• Item 2 – Sheldon posted the link to the Mock-up in the agenda.
• Item 2 – Todd and Cecile will continue to work on this and will follow up with Michael.

Review Progress for WG

• Todd – Project Milestones. The first one we had for October was “Assemble/recruit team, gather requirements, thoroughly review” we are not there yet, maybe we can break it into achievable parts and focus on that and the mock-up for the 1KP project. That could be a reasonable timeline for the next 3 months. Need Sheldon/Michael to provide a “dose of reality” when it comes to the timeline.
• Preliminary Project milestone can be found here https://pods.iplantcollaborative.org/wiki/display/iptol/TR_Project+Plan and also in Todd’s presentation https://pods.iplantcollaborative.org/wiki/download/attachments/2752532/reconciliation_1jul09.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1251138667000

Open Discussion

• Sheldon and Michael followed up with Ann Stapleton about the lack of momentum in iPAT. The main problem was Ann was not getting feedback from the members, and plans to contact them more aggressively. As a result the project has not begun on the 1 September start date.
• We will not spend a lot of resource until they (iPAT) articulate what they are trying to achieve and get the requirements and goals in order.
• ACTION: Jim suggested that it may be faster to get the required information by sending him an email of what we would like answered and he will track it down.
• The Mock-up – this should be worked on this week so that my next Monday we can have a clear idea of what the mock up will look like. The meeting is fast approaching. Sheldon posted a link to the mock-up so everyone can provide feedback.
• Mock-up link: https://pods.iplantcollaborative.org/wiki/display/iptol/TR_Mock-up
• Michael – Please continue discussions outside of these weekly meetings. The meetings give us an opportunity to focus on what needs to be done so we can follow up during the week to accomplish them. I believe we are on the right track reviewing the original document, clearly defining items and staying focused.

This is the reference for Prime-GSR that Michael inquired about:

• Akerborg O, Sennblad B, Arvestad L, Lagergren J. Simultaneous Bayesian gene tree reconstruction and reconciliation analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 7;106(14):5714-9. Epub 2009 Mar 19.PMID: 19299507.